Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Miyagi (blogger) (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 18:17, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Mr Miyagi (blogger) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:BIO, I'm unconvinced by the last AfD, 3 years have now passed to give him a chance to get more coverage. simply being a blogger for a newspaper does not automatically grant notability. can't find much coverage of him [1] except [2]. LibStar (talk) 07:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This could be merged into the main blog article if anything, but he isn't notable as there are no citations for all of the things in the article. --WngLdr34 (talk) 13:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable bio. Nothing here establishes notability, nor did I turn anything up. Could be a language issue, but then, this is en-wiki, so if we can't find sources in english, there's not much we can do. Bfigura (talk) 02:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable bio. No sources. Stextc (talk) 04:12, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Notability is questionable. 3 years have passed, and still NO references/sources to support. As WP:BLP states, "Material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." Thus this article should be removed immediately. Jolenine (Talk - My Contribs) 01:36, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.